16:30:45 <djmitche> #startmeeting weekly
16:30:45 <bb-supy> Meeting started Tue May 10 16:30:45 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is djmitche. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
16:30:45 <bb-supy> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
16:30:45 <bb-supy> The meeting name has been set to 'weekly'
16:30:49 <bb-github> [13buildbot] 15djmitche commented on issue #2208: :+1:  02https://git.io/vrUza
16:31:03 <djmitche> #topic Introduction
16:31:04 <djmitche> https://titanpad.com/buildbot-agenda
16:31:15 * djmitche waves to everyone
16:31:48 <djmitche> I don't see much in the agenda this week, so probably pretty quick meeting!
16:31:53 <djmitche> #topic Development week in review
16:32:41 <djmitche> A few bugs got closed this week (2)
16:33:01 <djmitche> Looks like we're up to 20 0.9.0 blockers though :(
16:34:48 <bb-github> [13buildbot] 15djmitche commented on issue #2206: :shipit:  02https://git.io/vrUgC
16:35:56 <djmitche> #info Regarding bug 2340, from earlier today: "worker changes not finished and should not be released yet"
16:36:09 <rutsky> hi!
16:36:12 <djmitche> hi!
16:36:19 * djmitche feels less alone
16:36:35 <rutsky> actualy we talked with tardyp and decided that it's ok to release buildbot-worker
16:36:55 <djmitche> ok
16:36:58 <djmitche> as a beta?
16:37:04 * tomprince is here but hasn't had anything to add.
16:37:07 <rutsky> from protocol point of view it behaves in the same way as "buildslave"
16:37:12 <gracinet1> I'm there too, not much to say
16:37:13 <rutsky> as beta, yes
16:37:18 <djmitche> ok, great
16:37:40 <djmitche> #info but buildbot-worker does not block making another beta release, even including the worker
16:38:16 <rutsky> I think tardyp working on recently found (serious?) bug --- this is what blocking next beta release
16:38:36 <tardyp> hi sorry for being late
16:39:05 <bb-github> [13buildbot] 15djmitche commented on issue #2201: :+1:  02https://git.io/vrU23
16:39:07 <tardyp> http://trac.buildbot.net/ticket/3546#comment:4
16:39:24 <gracinet1> hi tardyp, was wondering if that was the blocker bug
16:39:32 <tardyp> gracinet1: found it, and also ssavrim at the same time
16:39:46 <tardyp> I think so, if MasterShellCommand is broken
16:40:04 <tardyp> and also old style steps
16:40:13 <djmitche> #info gracinet and ssavrim both discovered bug 3546 at the same time; it is blocking a beta release
16:41:14 <rutsky> tardyp: can you comment on https://github.com/buildbot/buildbot/pull/2138#issuecomment-216610201?
16:41:32 <tardyp> so ssavrim is going to make sure there is no more issue with logs with my fix, and after that, I'll publish
16:41:43 <tardyp> waiting for that, I hold the PR merges
16:41:56 <gracinet1> ok
16:42:18 <tomprince> I'm guessing the parallel latent work will probably land this week.
16:42:25 <djmitche> awesome
16:42:33 <djmitche> #info parallel latent work will be ready to land this week
16:42:53 <djmitche> tomprince: do you think that will increase risk of bugs? i.e. should we hold until after 0.9.0?
16:43:10 <bb-github> [13buildbot] 15tardyp commented on issue #2138: > Is it http://trac.buildbot.net/ticket/3396?... 02https://git.io/vrU27
16:43:40 <tardyp> I think this fixes a lot of bug, rather
16:43:46 <tomprince> I don't think so. It has been tested in production.
16:43:47 <tardyp> latent has lots of issues
16:43:55 <mattiasr> tomprince: the talk about locks yesterday, would it still apply on nine? or is there another implementation that i should look at?
16:44:06 <mattiasr> was wondering if i should make a feature request or not :P
16:44:14 <tomprince> Doesn't fix most of the latent issues.
16:44:30 <tomprince> mattiasr:  I think so.
16:44:47 <djmitche> ok, sounds like a net win :)
16:45:15 <tardyp> tomprince: doesn't he fix the parralel latent start?
16:45:39 <tardyp> which is annoying at least 2 separate users (that I know)
16:46:21 <tomprince> It does fix that.
16:46:51 <djmitche> awesome
16:46:55 <djmitche> anything else I've omitted?
16:46:58 <bb-trac> [trac] #3396/defect (new) updated by rutsky (@tardyp, is this issue resolved?) http://trac.buildbot.net/ticket/3396
16:48:22 <bb-trac> [trac] #3396/defect (closed) updated by tardyp (resolved as per guanlecoja0.5.5) http://trac.buildbot.net/ticket/3396
16:48:34 <tardyp> djmitche: nope
16:48:47 * djmitche calls it then
16:49:05 <djmitche> it's good to hear of so much progress!
16:49:07 <djmitche> #endmeeting